A qualitative exploration of a UK nature-based social prescribing scheme: The service user perspective
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.71164/socialmedicine.v19i2.2026.2255Keywords:
Nature-based social prescribing (NBSP), social prescribing, wellbeing, community healthAbstract
Social prescribing schemes are growing in the UK. Evidence in support of nature-based social prescribing referrals, a specific sub-set of social prescribing, is mounting, however there are several challenges to capturing impact. Many evaluations have focused on health improvement to gauge impact. The service user perspective is critical to understanding the wider value and warrants continued exploration. Potential for participant insights to identify ‘active ingredients’ of schemes could inform the development of future frameworks designed to understand best practice, ensure efficient use of NHS funds, resource allocation and reduce the burden on primary care. Thus, this study aimed to understand the value of nature-based social prescribing schemes from the service user perspective. Three focus group discussions (n=22) and 17 one-to-one interviews were conducted (59% male participants). The thematic analysis generated three themes: ‘Community’, ‘nature connection and exposure’ and ‘ripple effects’; which highlighted the value of participation. Nature-based social prescribing schemes benefit participants in a multitude of ways. They help provide a safe and supported place to develop personal identity and social skills which are vital for social connection and a sense of purpose. Nature exposure and connection afforded was important in facilitating these benefits. Specific features of the local scheme studied also highlighted the critical importance third sector staff play in delivering services to those facing deprivation, unemployment and or poor wellbeing. The relationships between scheme leaders and service users created opportunities to develop skills, and self-confidence which created ripple effects that extended beyond the immediate setting.
References
Khan, H., Giurca, B. C., Sanderson, J., Dixon, M., Leitch, A., & Cook, C. Social prescribing around the world—a world map of global developments in social prescribing across different health system contexts [Internet]. London (UK): National Academy for Social Prescribing; 2023
Kings fund 2020, What is social prescribing? Accessed [5.9.24] at What Is Social Prescribing? | The King's Fund (kingsfund.org.uk)
Wallace, C., Newstead, S., Wallace, S., Lynch, M., Elliott, M., Llewellyn, M., & Randall, S. (2024). Social Prescribing in Wales. In Social Prescribing Policy, Research and Practice: Transforming Systems and Communities for Improved Health and Wellbeing (pp. 65-84). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
NFSP; National framework for social prescribing. Welsh government 19th January 2024. Policy and strategy document. Accessed (8.8.24) at National framework for social prescribing [HTML] | GOV.WALES
National Centre for Creative Health
Jenkins, C., Lambert, K., & Mackintosh, W. (2025). An introduction to creative health. InnovAiT, 18(3), 135-139.
Mughal, R., Seers, H., Polley, M., Sabey, A., & Chatterjee, H. J. (2022). How the natural environment can support health and wellbeing through social prescribing.
Schertz, K. E., & Berman, M. G. (2019). Understanding nature and its cognitive benefits. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 28(5), 496-502.
Seers, Helen, Rabya Mughal, and Helen Chatterjee. "Connection to nature." (2022): 20230324580.
Capaldi, C. A., Passmore, H. A., Nisbet, E. K., Zelenski, J. M., & Dopko, R. L. (2015). Flourishing in nature: A review of the benefits of connecting with nature and its application as a wellbeing intervention. International Journal of Wellbeing, 5(4).
Reis, A., Gray, T., Mann, J. et al. Measuring nature-based health interventions – a rapid review of instrumentation and outcomes. Journal of Outdoor and Environmental Education 27, 57–186 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42322-023-00135-3
Staras, C. O., Wakefield, J. R., McDermott, D. T., & Jones, B. A. (2024). An evaluation of the role of social identity processes for enhancing health outcomes within UK‐based social prescribing initiatives designed to increase social connection and reduce loneliness: A systematic review. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 34(5), e2878.
Menhas, R., Yang, L., Saqib, Z. A., Younas, M., & Saeed, M. M. (2024). Does nature-based social prescription improve mental health outcomes? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Frontiers in Public Health, 12, 1228271.
Mughal, R., Seers, H., Polley, M., Sabey, A., & Chatterjee, H. J. (2022). How the natural environment can support health and wellbeing through social prescribing.
Cooper, M., Avery, L., Scott, J., Ashley, K., Jordan, C., Errington, L., & Flynn, D. (2022). Effectiveness and active ingredients of social prescribing interventions targeting mental health: a systematic review. BMJ open, 12(7), e060214.
Makanjuola, A., Lynch, M., Hartfiel, N., Cuthbert, A., & Edwards, R. T. (2023). Prevention of poor physical and mental health through the green social prescribing opening doors to the outdoors programme: a social return on investment analysis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(12), 6111.
Lynch, M., Whiteley, H., Hartfiel, N., Edwards, R. T., & Cuthbert, A. (2024). 57 Nature based social prescribing for enhancing mental health and well-being. European Journal of Public Health, 34(Supplement_2), ckae114-090.
Kenyon, A. V., Coventry, P., White, P., Montasem, A., Phukan, S., & Ozols-Riding, J. (2023). Evaluation of the West Yorkshire Health and Care Partnership Green Social Prescribing Funding Programme.
Sands, G., Blake, H., Carter, T., & Spiby, H. (2023). Nature-Based Interventions in the UK: A Mixed Methods Study Exploring Green Prescribing for Promoting the Mental Wellbeing of Young Pregnant Women. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(20), 6921.
Dayson, C., & Leather, D. (2020). Evaluation of HALE Community Connectors Social Prescribing Service 2018-19.
Bagnall, A. M., & Brymer, E. (2019). Social return on investment analysis of the health and wellbeing impacts of Wildlife Trust programmes.
Foster, A., & Dayson, C. (2024). Evaluation of the South Yorkshire Tackling and Preventing Mental Health Through Green Social Prescribing Project: Data and Insights 2021/22-2023/24.
Sachs, A. L., Kolster, A., Wrigley, J., Papon, V., Opacin, N., Hill, N., ... & Litt, J. (2024). Connecting through nature: A systematic review of the effectiveness of nature-based social prescribing practices to combat loneliness. Landscape and Urban Planning, 248, 105071.
Leavell, M. A., Leiferman, J. A., Gascon, M., Braddick, F., Gonzalez, J. C., & Litt, J. S. (2019). Nature-based social prescribing in urban settings to improve social connectedness and mental well-being: a review. Current environmental health reports, 6, 297-308.
Activation - National Association of Primary Care
NFSP; National framework for social prescribing. Welsh government 19th January 2024. Policy and strategy document. Accessed (8.8.24) at National framework for social prescribing [HTML] | GOV.WALES
DEFRA (2011). Good practice in social prescribing for mental health: the role of nature based interventions (NECR228) natural England. Accessed from http://publications.naturalengland.org.uk/publication/5134438692814848#: ~:text=Good%20practice%20in%20social%20prescribing%20for%20mental%20h ealth%3A,Access%20to%20the%20countryside%20- %20research%20and%20evidence
Bickerdike L, Booth A, Wilson PM, et al. Social prescribing: less rhetoric and more reality. A systematic review of the evidence. BMJ Open 2017;7:e013384.doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013384
Pescheny, J. V., Randhawa, G., & Pappas, Y. (2020). The impact of social prescribing services on service users: a systematic review of the evidence. European journal of public health, 30(4), 664-673.
Griffiths, C., Hina, F., & Jiang, H. (2022). Social prescribing through primary care: a systematic review of the evidence. Open journal of preventive medicine, 12(2), 31-58.
Tate, C., Tran, N., Longo, A., Barry, J., Taylor, T., O'Neill, C., & Hunter, R. (2024). Economic evaluations of urban green and blue space interventions: A scoping review. Ecological Economics, 222, 108217.
Brown, M. & Aylett, K. (2025). Interrogating green social prescribing in South Wales; A multi-stakeholder qualitative exploration. PLOS ONE, 20(1), e0314107. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0314107,
Sands, G., Blake, H., Carter, T., & Spiby, H. (2023). Nature-Based Interventions in the UK: A Mixed Methods Study Exploring Green Prescribing for Promoting the Mental Wellbeing of Young Pregnant Women. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(20), 6921.
Cooper, M., Flynn, D., Scott, J., Ashley, K., & Avery, L. (2024). Barriers and Facilitators to the Design and Delivery of Social Prescribing Services to Support Adult Mental Health: Perspectives of Social Prescribing Service Providers. Health & Social Care in the Community, 2024(1), 5581012.
Jenkins, C., Lambert, K., & Mackintosh, W. (2025). An introduction to creative health. InnovAiT, 18(3), 135-139.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology, 3(2), 77-101.
Staras, C. O., Wakefield, J. R., McDermott, D. T., & Jones, B. A. (2024). An evaluation of the role of social identity processes for enhancing health outcomes within UK‐based social prescribing initiatives designed to increase social connection and reduce loneliness: A systematic review. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 34(5), e2878.
Bhatti, S., Rayner, J., Pinto, A. D., Mulligan, K., & Cole, D. C. (2021). Using self-determination theory to understand the social prescribing process: a qualitative study. BJGP open, 5(2).
Warran, K., Burton, A., & Fancourt, D. (2022). What are the active ingredients of ‘arts in health’ activities? Development of the INgredients iN ArTs in hEalth (INNATE) Framework. Wellcome Open Research, 7.
de Bell, S., Alejandre, J. C., Menzel, C., Sousa-Silva, R., Straka, T. M., Berzborn, S., ... & Bonn, A. (2024). Nature-based social prescribing programmes: opportunities, challenges, and facilitators for implementation. Environment International, 108801.
Elliott, M., Davies, M., Davies, J., & Wallace, C. (2022). Exploring how and why social prescribing evaluations work: a realist review. BMJ open, 12(4), e057009.
Wildman, J.M., Moffatt, S., Steer, M. et al. Service-users’ perspectives of link worker social prescribing: a qualitative follow-up study. BMC Public Health 19, 98 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-6349-x
Impact Report 2023 | Centre for Sustainable Healthcare
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.