More than just meds: National survey of providers’ perceptions of patients’ social, economic, environmental, and legal needs and their effect on emergency department utilization

Authors

  • Lia ilona Losonczy Highland Hospital, Alameda Health System
  • Dennis Hsieh Alameda County Medical Center, Highland Hospital
  • Chris Hahn MD, Alameda County Medical Center, Highland Hospital
  • Jahan Fahimi MD, Alameda County Medical Center, Highland Hospital
  • Harrison Alter MD, MS, Alameda County Medical Center, Highland Hospital

Keywords:

emergency medicine, health disparities, health insurance, social medicine, public health, social determinants of health

Abstract

Introduction: Emergency departments (EDs) are the safety net for millions of patients who need to access care. Many of these patients have social needs that may influence their healthcare. Methods: We sought to understand ED providers’ perceptions of health-related social issues facing their patients by conducting an online survey of emergency medicine physicians nationally. Respondents ranked patients’ most common needs, which needs affected healthcare use, and interest in education on these needs. We also queried when needs are assessed and reasons they are not. Responses are reported as proportions, stratified by training level and program type; the chi-square test was used to assess differences between groups. Results: We broadcast survey links to 168 US emergency medicine training programs, receiving 432 responses from 79 different institutions in 31 states; 45% of the respondents were residents and 49% attendings; 47% identified as academic, 28% as county, 18% as community, and 7% as mixed. Providers’ ranked factors that influenced ED visits; naming lack of health insurance, homelessness, and transportation problems as several of the top non-medical needs they see in the ED. All respondents replied that they care for patients with social needs; all but two felt that social needs move patients to return to the ED. While providers consistently ask about social needs, for any specific social need the number of doctors who routinely ask ranges from 61-100% depending on need. Reasons for not asking included feeling unable to act, lack of time, and lack of knowledge. Only a small minority felt that addressing non-medical needs was not part of their job or that needs were not relevant to patients’ health. Most providers (80%) would like more resources and 70% reported they would attend educational sessions if they were available. We found no difference between attendings and residents in interest in attending educational sessions or in the percentage who ask about needs. Providers from all types of institutions were equally likely to believe social needs caused patients to return and to ask about such needs. Conclusions: This study highlights the fact that emergency department providers around the country see a large number of social needs. They identified specific needs that increase the utilization of healthcare services. These needs would more likely be addressed if greater referral resources were available.

Author Biography

Lia ilona Losonczy, Highland Hospital, Alameda Health System

Resident Physician, PGY-3 Department of Emergency Medicine

References

Gordon JA, Chudnofsky CR, Hayward RA. Where health and welfare meet: social deprivation among patients in the emergency department. J Urban Heal Bull New York Acad Med. 2001;78(1):104–11.

Seligman HK, Laraia BA, Kushel MB. Food insecurity is associated with chronic disease among low-income NHANES participants. J Nutr. 2010;140(2):304–10.

Rodriguez RM, Fortman J, Chee C, Ng V, Poon D. Food, Shelter and Safety Needs Motivating Homeless Persons’ Visits to an Urban Emergency Department. Ann Emerg Med. 2009;53(5).

Kangovi S, Barg FK, Carter T, Long JA, Shannon R, Grande D. Understanding why patients of low socioeconomic status prefer hospitals over ambulatory care. Health Aff. 2013;32(7):1196–203.

Zink BJ. Social justice, egalitarianism, and the history of emergency medicine. virtual mentor Am Med Assoc J Ethics [Internet]. Amer Med Assoc; 2010 Jun;12(6):492–4. Available from: http://virtualmentor.ama-assn.org/2010/06/mhst1-1006.html

Lowenstein SR, Koziol-McLain J, Thompson M, Bernstein E, Greenberg K, Gerson LW, et al. Behavioral risk factors in emergency department patients: a multisite survey. Acad Emerg Med Off J Soc Acad Emerg Med. 1998;5(8):781–7.

Gordon JA, Billings J, Asplin BR, Rhodes K V. Safety net research in emergency medicine: proceedings of the Academic Emergency Medicine Consensus Conference on “The Unraveling Safety Net”. Academic emergency medicine: official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine. 2001. p. 1024–9.

Marmot MG, Bell R. Action on health disparities in the United States: commission on social determinants of health. JAMA J Am Med Assoc. 2009;301(11):1169–71.

Hana S, Ladislav C. Subjective well-being, morbidity and health care consumption by hazardous, harmful and problem alcohol drinkers. Casopís lékar̆ů c̆eských [Internet]. 2011;150(7):394–7. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22044086

Larimer ME, Malone DK, Garner MD, Atkins DC, Burlingham B, Lonczak HS, et al. Health care and public service use and costs before and after provision of housing for chronically homeless persons with severe alcohol problems. JAMA J Am Med Assoc. 2009;301(13):1349–57.

Shumway M, Boccellari A, O’Brien K, Okin RL. Cost-effectiveness of clinical case management for ED frequent users: results of a randomized trial. Am J Emerg Med [Internet]. 2008 Feb [cited 2015 Apr 12];26(2):155–64. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0735675707003026

Taubman SL, Allen HL, Wright BJ, Baicker K, Finkelstein AN. Medicaid increases emergency-department use: evidence from Oregon’s Health Insurance Experiment. Science (80- ) [Internet]. 2014;343(6168):263–8. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24385603

Sprague S, Madden K, Simunovic N, Godin K, Pham NK, Bhandari M, et al. Barriers to Screening for Intimate Partner Violence. Women Health. 2012;52(6):587–605.

Screening for Intimate Partner Violence and Abuse of Elderly and Vulnerable Adults [Internet]. Recommendation Summary. Recommendation Summary; 2013. Available from: http://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/Page/Topic/recommendation-summary/intimate-partner-violence-and-abuse-of-elderly-and-vulnerable-adults-screening

Rhodes K V., Lauderdale DS, Stocking CB, Howes DS, Roizen MF, Levinson W. Better health while you wait: A controlled trial of a computer-based intervention for screening and health promotion in the emergency department. Ann Emerg Med. 2001;37(3):284–91.

Tobin E. Allies Not Adversaries: Teaching Collaboration To the Next Generation of Doctors and Lawyers To Address Social Inequality. J Heal Care Law Policy. 2008 Sep;11:249–94.

National Center for Medical-Legal Partnership [Internet]. Milken Institute School of Public Health. he George Washington University; [cited 2014 May 17]. Available from: http://medical-legalpartnership.org/

Zuckerman B, Sandel M, Smith L, Lawton E. Why pediatricians need lawyers to keep children healthy. Pediatrics. 2004;114(1):224–8.

Alter HJ. Social determinants of health: from bench to bedside. JAMA Intern Med [Internet]. 2014;174(4):543–5. Available from: http://archinte.jamanetwork.com.ucsf.idm.oclc.org/article.aspx?articleid=1828740

Social Emergency Medicine & Population Health Fellowship [Internet]. Stanford University Medical Center. Stanford University Medical Center; 2008 [cited 2014 Jul 5]. Available from: http://emed.stanford.edu/fellowships/mph.html

Department of Social Medicine. Preventive Medicine Residency [Internet]. UNC School of Medicine. University of North Carolina; 2013 [cited 2014 Jul 5]. Available from: http://www.med.unc.edu/socialmed/prevmed

Downloads

Published

2014-12-21

Issue

Section

Original Research