Religious Identity and Abortion Attitudes Among University Students in the Post-Roe v. Wade Era

Abstract

Introduction. The recent overturning of Roe v. Wade has brought uncertainty about the societal impact on abortion. This study explores how students' religious identity influences their views on the appropriate gestational age for abortion and acceptance of opposing viewpoints, especially in this altered legal context. Methods. Using a cross-sectional design, students at a Florida public university answered an anonymous survey inquiring about: attitudes towards abortion, covering opinions on gestational age acceptability, respecting diverse views, and stances on federal protections for abortion. Descriptive statistics and multivariate analysis of variance were used to compare trends across religious groups. Results. Significant findings (Wilk’s Λ = 0.59, F = 1.49, p< 0.05) revealed distinct differences among religious groups. Notable outcomes included: 1) 30% supporting abortion in the first trimester; 2) 30% favoring abortion at any gestational age; 3) 10% advocating restricting abortion to cases of rape/incest; and 4) 88% endorsing a Federal Law (p< 0.05).  Discussion. Diverse opinions on abortion gestational age signify support for accessible and legal abortion options. Disparities in access highlight the need for equitable care and respecting patient autonomy. Recognizing the correlation between religious identity and abortion perspectives emphasizes the need for tailored care strategies. Adapting to this changing landscape urges policymakers to reconsider federal protections for women's reproductive rights. Conclusion. Understanding the interplay between religious identity and abortion viewpoints informs personalized care approaches. Adapting to healthcare’s evolution requires policymakers to reassess federal protections, ensuring equitable access to reproductive rights post-Roe v. Wade.