Impact of Informal Caregiving on Health Outcomes: A Population-Based Analysis Using BRFSS Data (2015–2020)

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.71164/socialmedicine.v19i3.2026.2479

Keywords:

caregivers, health disparities, mental health, population health, BRFSS

Abstract

Background. Informal caregivers provide essential care to family and friends with health conditions or disabilities, yet population-level health impacts remain underexplored.Objective: To examine associations between informal caregiving and physical and mental health outcomes using nationally representative U.S. data.Methods. Data were drawn from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) 2015–2020. Respondents who reported providing regular care or assistance to a family member or friend were classified as caregivers. Poor physical and mental health were defined as ≥14 days of poor health in the past 30 days. Survey-weighted logistic regression models were used to compare outcomes between caregivers and non-caregivers.Results. Among 422,495 respondents, 21.3% were caregivers. After weighting, caregivers had 28% higher odds of poor physical health (OR=1.28; 95% CI: 1.23–1.34; p<0.001) and 70% higher odds of poor mental health (OR=1.70; 95% CI: 1.63–1.77; p<0.001) compared to non-caregivers. Disparities were stable from 2015–2020 and evident across all U.S. regions.Conclusions. Informal caregiving is associated with substantially worse physical and mental health outcomes at the population level. The persistence of these disparities highlights the need for policy and clinical interventions to support caregiver wellbeing. This methodology, leveraging population-based surveillance systems such as BRFSS, can be applied globally to assess caregiver health and inform equitable public health policy.

References

National Alliance for Caregiving; AARP Public Policy Institute. Caregiving in the U.S. 2020. Washington (DC): National Alliance for Caregiving; 2020.

Redfoot D, Feinberg L, Houser A. The aging of the baby boom and the growing care gap: a look at future declines in the availability of family caregivers. Washington (DC): AARP Public Policy Institute; 2013.

Pinquart M, Sörensen S. Differences between caregivers and noncaregivers in psychological health and physical health: a meta-analysis. Psychol Aging. 2003;18(2):250-67.

Schulz R, Sherwood PR. Physical and mental health effects of family caregiving. Am J Nurs. 2008;108(9 Suppl):23-7.

Roth DL, Fredman L, Haley WE. Informal caregiving and its impact on health: a reappraisal from population-based studies. Gerontologist. 2015;55(2):309-19.

Hoffman GJ, Lee J, Mendez-Luck CA. Health behaviors among baby boomer informal caregivers. Gerontologist. 2012;52(2):219-30.

Cannuscio CC, Jones C, Kawachi I, Colditz G, Berkman L, Rimm E. Reverberations of family illness: a longitudinal assessment of informal caregiving and mental health status in the Nurses’ Health Study. Am J Public Health. 2002;92(8):1305-11.

Haley WE, Roth DL, Howard G, Safford MM. Caregiving strain and estimated risk for stroke and coronary heart disease among spouse caregivers: differential effects by race and sex. Stroke. 2010;41(2):331-6.

Moriarty DG, Zack MM, Kobau R. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s Healthy Days Measures: population tracking of perceived physical and mental health over time. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2003;1:37.

Schulz R, Beach SR. Caregiving as a risk factor for mortality: the Caregiver Health Effects Study. JAMA. 1999;282(23):2215-9.

Burton AM, Sautter JM, Tulsky JA, Lindquist JH, Hays JC, Olsen MK, et al. Burden and well-being among a diverse sample of cancer, congestive heart failure, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease caregivers. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2012;44(3):410-20.

Bevans M, Sternberg EM. Caregiving burden, stress, and health effects among family caregivers of adult cancer patients. JAMA. 2012;307(4):398-403.

Adelman RD, Tmanova LL, Delgado D, Dion S, Lachs MS. Caregiver burden: a clinical review. JAMA. 2014;311(10):1052-60.

Feinberg L, Reinhard SC, Houser A, Choula R. Valuing the invaluable: 2019 update. Washington (DC): AARP Public Policy Institute; 2019

Published

2026-09-01

Issue

Section

Original Research